Do you remember 1998 when Harvey Danger released a song called "Flagpole sitta"? The song was ambiguous. What is a flagpole sitter? But it was catchy and unavoidable if you listened to the radio. (iPods did not exist seven years ago.)
Maybe you are more familiar with the career of Harvey Danger, but I only recently realized they had released a couple more albums and were signed to Kill Rock Stars. More importantly, I found out they released their album Little By Little... as a free download on their website. A noble act, maybe. The band explains the reason behind the free download in a press release:
...it’s important that people understand the free download
concept isn’t a frivolous act. It’s a key part of our promotional
campaign, along with radio and press promotion, live shows, and videos.
They go on to explain the band would rather everyone hear the album than make money from album sales. Okay.
Although I enjoyed "Flagpole sitta" when I was 18, I had no further interest in Harvey Danger's sound. My opinion of Little By Little...: Blah. If it wasn't for the free download, I wouldn't have heard it at all, so I guess the band accomplished it's more noble goal.
I'll admit it. I download music regularly. Most of the songs are available legally via the band's website, myspace page, or label site. Occasionally, my downloading practices are not on the up and up though. The albums I download illegally are usually not cds I would purchase anyway. When I buy vinyl, I also download the tracks since I can't carry my turntable in my messenger bag. I don't feel guilty about downloading.
The optimist in me thinks the availability of music on the internet exposes more people to better music. I'd like to think my teenage listening habits would be less embarrassing if I had access to the music the way we access it now. The debate will continue until technology makes it irrelevant again.